Tip: Start typing in the input box for immediate search results.
20250926 Friday’s Team – Friday Sep 26, 2025
🌍✨ A Call to Conscience: What Does It Mean to Be Truly Human?
What if being “human” isn’t a birthright — but a daily choice?
In this Main Address with Machiventa Melchizedek, our Planetary Manager asks us one of the most piercing questions of our time:
“What is Human — and what is Not Human?”
It’s not a riddle of biology, but of morality, compassion, and soul growth.
Machiventa challenges us to see humanity not as a label, but as a living standard — one defined by empathy, justice, and co-creative responsibility with Spirit.
For too long, our world has tolerated cruelty, corruption, and moral blindness as if they were normal. But what if the future generations of Light and Life — the peaceful civilizations to come — are built on a new kind of awareness, one that no longer excuses the dehumanization of others nor allows moral decay to pass as freedom?
💫 This message asks us to look inward — to evolve our conscience, our culture, and our compassion.
Machiventa reminds us that the world’s sickness is not just political or social — it is spiritual immaturity. And that the cure begins not with judgment, but with understanding:
- What causes a human being to lose their empathy?
- Can a society exist without predators, violence, and fear?
- How can we co-creatively build moral systems that protect the innocent while nurturing the good?
These are not abstract questions — they are blueprints for planetary evolution.
The celestial vision of a future without crime, exploitation, or moral confusion depends on how you and I begin to think, speak, and act today.
🌱 To be human is to grow.
💗 To be human is to care.
🔥 To be human is to take moral responsibility — not only for ourselves, but for the generations that follow.
In this discourse, Machiventa introduces a radical idea:
that evil and good are not static identities, but choices — and those who willfully reject empathy and moral growth choose to become “Non-Human.”
Yet even this concept is not born of condemnation, but of protection — protection for the innocent, for the children yet unborn, for the soul of civilization itself.
This is not a call for punishment — it’s a call for awakening.
To build moral systems infused with compassion, to educate hearts as deeply as we educate minds, and to anchor our society in the Seven Core Values that define the soul of humankind:
🌍 Life | ⚖️ Equality | 🌱 Growth | 💫 Quality of Life | 💕 Compassion | 🤝 Empathy | 🔥 Love
Each of these values is not just a principle — it’s a spiritual technology for the survival of civilization.
So ask yourself:
“If humanity is defined by empathy, where does my daily life reflect it?”
“What kind of future am I helping to design — one of fear, or one of Light?”
📖 Read this message deeply. Let it provoke you, stretch you, and invite you to reimagine what it means to be truly human.
For as Machiventa reminds us:
“We are designing the society that your great-great-grandchildren will live in.”
The choice is no longer theoretical — it is moral.
It is planetary.
It is yours.
20250926 Friday’ ‘s Team – Session Friday 26th Sept 2025
Present: Daniel, Raphael, Sherille Raphael, Kona Mahu, Marthe Muller; Bea Ngai; Bob Wilson; Jacques Reverseau
Note: This transcript is slightly edited for ease of use. Only the discussion with Celestial is recorded here.
TR : Daniel Raphael Facilitator : Kona Mahu,
Group Check-in before the session
This moment is not registered here, because it is private and it serves as Team bonding.
Table of Contents
1. what is HUMAN and what is Not Human?
2. How do we Co-Creatively bring about a crime-free society
3. Removing those “Non-Human” for the protection of future generations
4. By eliminated “Non-Human”, we feel like we are eliminating the possibility of rehabilitation
5. We are asking you to set a new definition for humans
6. Today it would be difficult to implement Capital Punishment
8. Right now, we’re having great difficulty introducing the simple level of Societal Morality
9. From Punishment to Spiritual Continuity: Envisioning Future Justice
10. Messages from the First Source Center: Beyond Religion, Politics, and Lineage
11. Creating a serie of articles defining What is Human and What is Not-Human
12. Bea’s proposal for a definition of Human and Non-Human
Session introduction by Kona
Kona: Hi, good morning, friends. This is Kona with the Center for Planetary Management. It is September 26th, 2025, and we are about to begin our meditation. We have Daniel with us today, and we will hear from Machiventa. Thanks for joining, Jacques, take it away.
Centering moment as a Team by Jacques
Jacques: Today we have the Team nearly complete with Daniel, we are very pleased with that. And as his group knows very well, we are not only working as Co-Creative with the Celestial, but we rely on them, and they rely on us, so this is very important to have this in mind during this session.
So, my friend, just relax your body on your seat. Take some deep breaths. Connect with your Thought Adjuster, see your Thought Adjuster close to you, as well as your Guardian Angels.
Envision a beam of light coming from the center of the universe, a golden cord of light going to your crown chakra, through all your chakras, down to the earth. You are illuminated by this beautiful Divine. Love energy. You feel the peace,you feel the harmony.
Now we connect our heart line clockwise around the globe. Then we connect our mindal line counterclockwise around the globe. And now, as human we are really grounded and connected all together in one electrical circuit.
We ask our Celestial Friends the Melchizedek Teachers to join us as well as all those who want to join us, Angels, those far away, looking at us including those from the Sea of Glass looking at us as well. Now we stay silent in a prayer for 3mn.
Kona: Thank you so much, Jacques. I just invite everyone to come back into the gathering. Machiventa has a message for us that Daniel and I tried to complete yesterday. He had several power outages, and so, as it turns out, it really needs to be addressed to the whole team, so we know how the Celestials work, and sometimes things don’t happen as we expect, because they’re going to happen the way that they need to happen, and here we are.
We’ve spent much time on June 6th transmission and writing the article. I’ve spoken with Daniel about it, submitted our edits, the final edits, and then we got the message from Sondjah last week, saying, we don’t have to fix anything. We don’t have to show that kind of caution. And so Machiventa has a message for us regarding these things now.
So, it’s really important that today, whatever questions you have, whatever questions you had from that transmission that we bring those up today, because that’s what we were the gist of what I got yesterday before we were cut off, that’s what Machiventa wants, is if we’re not comfortable with something that’s being said, we need to ask immediately those questions.
And so that’s what Machiventa is doing here today, is to address your questions and your concerns, and how to move forward. We are a Design Team, we are learning as we go. Celestial are learning as well. And this is a learning moment, because we’re going to have many more broadcasts, and we need to know what to do when these things happen again, because we know it will.
So, Daniel, please, when you’re ready.
Main Addresses with Machiventa
1. what is HUMAN and what is Not Human?
Machiventa: Good day, this is Machiventa. I am your planetary manager and I have two issues I want to raise with you today. The first is the more difficult one as it involves each of you and the whole team. And that is when I raised the question, the issue, about “they are not human” on June 6th. That this was my foil. I wanted to poke you with it. So that it got your attention, and it did. And what happened after that is the issue that I want to speak to today.
At the time, you did not ask any questions. But you came away from the meeting on that day, made your own opinions, your own interpretations, and then argued and discussed among yourselves. You did not come to me for clarification either shortly thereafter, or write them in on a write them down and present them to me later. You continue to fuss and stew about this issue about what is human and what is not human.
The issue that I’m bringing today is not so much an answer to that question as that is a separate issue. But the issue I have with the team now is that here you have it’s very much like you talking to me as you would engage on the internet. You don’t see the internet as a person or authority. You simply present your question to some search engine, and voila! You get an answer!
And so it is with me. You must not stew about questions among yourselves that you need clarity from. Your mortal minds are limited to what you have experienced. I ask you, if you’re not able to form a question at the time that I present such an arguable point of view, that you would write it down and ask it later and not discussed and argue among your friends and the team here about what is what do you mean? Well, just ask me. I’m your internet, just with spirit. I’m your Universal Encyclopedia to the limitations that you can understand.
Now, the point that I was trying to make to you, had you asked for their question, is that I wanted you to think about the issue of the “Non-Human” in the terms of decades and generations ahead. You see, the days of light and life will not have crime. It will not have people who create egregious acts as mass shootings, mass murders, mass killings. And you should drop back a few more decades, generations and say, well, how did that come about?
What did we do to change that whole arena of crime so that it is gone? And that people can live in peace. And the society provides a socially conducive cocoon of protection and compassion for those in plight and difficulty. Life is hard enough for you without contending with mass murders. People who come to your door and shoot you and want to take over your house for your car, or anything else. How did that come about?
2. How do we Co-Creatively bring about a crime-free society
Well, the questions I wanted you to ask are such that it would lead you to ask me. How do we bring about, how do we Co-Creatively bring about a crime-free society. What will we have done in the future, to assure that our children are not kidnapped, there’s no sexual abuse of children, or others, and no murders, no rapes. How did this come about?
Step aside a moment. You live on one of the most socially immoral, retarded planets in all of Nebadon. And the evidence of that is in the news every day. The alarming news that you hear of shootings, murders, carjackings, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
It would take me an hour to read all the headline news around the world of all the evil that occurs. And we weren’t blaming it on Caligastia, or Satan, or Lucifer. No, we are signing this to individuals who willed, made decisions to do harm to others. Now, on a world as this, the certain moral compromises are going to need to be done. Just as we cannot shoot you forward, move you forward in time so that you live in a crime-free world, so too, you live in a world that has crime.
And this is a Co-Creative world now. So, we need to make decisions that are conducive that, one, remove predators, and two, augments those talents and skills that bring about moral and ethical enculturation and socialization of each new generation of children.
3. Removing those “Non-Human” for the protection of future generations
Now, what I’m presenting is a compromise. That when we remove those who are no longer human. And I’ll discuss that in a moment for you. We do so at the protection of future generations. In fact, in the morality of your species, it is immoral not to remove these individuals because you cause great harm to those individuals of future generations.
Now, this one has known a woman 30 years ago, who went to the grocery store and was raped in the parking lot. She was in therapy for 25 years. And eventually, her therapist died, and eventually she did too. But she lived with that trauma, that PTSD memory of that rape. Now, what was the quality of her life during those years?
Could incarceration make up for that? No. How do we prevent that individual, the perpetrator from doing that again? And how do we protect future generations for individuals similar as that? Well, of necessity, we must make a compromise under the conditions of this planet, so that we can remove those individuals who are predatory, and protect those of the future generations from predation. Now, if you’re discussing this, whether these people are human or not, that’s almost irrelevant.
The act is the question, the quandary is do we have a moral right to remove the life from predators of such depraved behavior. And that is yes. And that if you don’t, if we don’t, that we have created an immoral situation for us. And that is intolerant to the celestial side of our co-created relationship. We want you to come on board with this because you are part and parcel the activators, the Co-Creative God mortals, who are making decisions about the future of future generations.
Let’s set that aside now. Your genome the Homo sapiens genome is the living definition of what is human. Humans are inherently natively, organically good people which we want to restore all the conditions so that good people can be raised from children into adulthood. Evil the contrary definition of mortals, humans make them non-human. They become Non-Human not by your definition, but by their choice. They have made a choice that they would prefer to be “Non-Human” and “Human”, to care, to be compassionate, to have empathy. To support others, to be good neighbors, to be fair business people. It’s not you who define them. They define themselves because they live outside the definition of your genome. I hope this is clear. And when I cease this conversation. I ask you to have present your questions.
Now, I presented part of the second question, the situation earlier, in that we are Co-Creatively involved with you and creating the days of light and life. We are designing the future society that your great-great-grandchildren will live in. And do you do you want them to be raped, killed, their houses burnt with them in it? You want them to have their cars hijacked? No, you don’t. And so, we must take action now. You see, we are setting in motion all the future actions that happen and prevent those things that will not happen. This one’s memory, his database has slipped a bit, and I hope that I can present the second or third part of this conversation to you. In the meantime, I’m open for your questions if you have any.
Group Dialogue & Discussion with Machiventa
4. By eliminated “Non-Human”, we feel like we are eliminating the possibility of rehabilitation
Kona: Thank you so much, Machiventa, thank you, Daniel. I do have some questions, but I’ll hear from the team first. If anyone has a particular question or I’ll be happy to go ahead. Okay, so from our discussion, the biggest thing that comes up is the idea that when we say someone is Not-Human, we feel like we are eliminating the possibility of rehabilitation. And so, by classifying someone as not human, I’m wondering, personally, if that means they’ve gone beyond the ability to be rehabilitated, and we should let that idea go. That’s my first question, so go ahead, please.
Machiventa: First of all, it’s not you who are in command of this, it is the individual who does the evil deeds, the predators. They can choose if they want to be rehabilitated. There are agencies in your societies which provide for that. Again, it is up to the individual, the predator, not you. You can offer these services, but you can’t make them, take them, take advantage of them. Just as you’ve seen, the recidivist rate from people who leave prisons who’ve been through worker use centers, who’ve been through help agencies while on work release, or upon being paroled or discharged.
Those services are made known to them. However, 93% of them don’t take advantage of it. And they return to prison having committed another crime. Just to answer your question, I sense that there’s something unanswered yet.
5. We are asking you to set a new definition for humans
Kona: Thank you so much, and I do not disagree at all that predators need to be removed. The second part of this question is, in this period of time, with marginalized individuals and an inequality of power being in a majority of people who do not have everybody’s best interests in mind. This message coming from a celestial; my concern is, it gives people in power that do not have people’s best interests in mind the opportunity to act in a disinterested way. It’s from a celestial perspective, giving people authority to do away with lives that probably shouldn’t have that. It might not need to have that authority. And so that’s my challenge, personally. I don’t know if anybody else feels that way, but it’s challenging to think of that. I see a few nods, so if you don’t mind addressing that, please, Machiventa.
Machiventa: You will need to set aside your anxieties and your worries. That is a future concern that does not affect the immediate moments. We are asking you to set a new definition for humans. We would like this to become an acquainted, this becomes a knowledgeable definition in the larger public. Whereas it is right now, there is no definition for these individuals who harm others as a matter of choice, a matter of will.
We’re really talking about the theology of belief here, the theology of self-willed individuals who were created in God’s image to have self-will. They can decide it’d be good, they can decide to be bad! And this does not mean that once we have defined them that they cannot do good, and that we would say this is a healthy individual. This person is no longer a non-human. They’re fully human.
When a person goes from misdeeds to trust, honesty, empathy, and compassion, they have become human, and that is the whole emphasis of child-rearing and parenting is to bring these children who are blank slates into social acceptance of others as equals of themselves, and treat them compassionately.
Set your anxieties aside. You can’t solve the future now. You must do what is needed to make up for all the history that this backward world has suffered under. Do you understand?
Kona: Yes, thank you so much for that clarity. It makes sense that we are creating new definitions under the circumstances, rather than becoming a judge and jury, so I am much more content with that explanation, and I greatly appreciate that.
Machiventa: Thank you.
Kona: I’ll have a future question, but right now, Bea has her hand raised, and we know that you love Bea’s questions, so please be unmute and go ahead.
Bea: Hello, Machiventa, thank you for being here, and I’m glad to be back. So, I have to be honest with you.
Machiventa: Please, always be honest.
6. Today it would be difficult to implement Capital Punishment
Bea: I will. Some of the things that I’ve heard today bother me. And I just I want to clarify one thing. And I think the reason some of the things bother me is that I’m thinking that so the actions you’re asking us to take. I’m thinking of them happening tomorrow. And perhaps maybe what you mean is that these things getting well, I don’t want to say disposing, but moving perpetrators on to the next world is going to happen sometime in the future, not tomorrow.
Because right now, I think if we took such drastic measures with capital punishment a lot of people on Earth, including myself, would be very uncomfortable making those types of difficult decisions without, first without first offering rehabilitation. It just sounds very to me, very black and white, and I’m uncomfortable with that.
Machiventa: No, we did not propose this to start tomorrow. In fact, your current democracy, administration, and so on, your processes of criminal justice are so retarded as in legislative process who couldn’t resolve this in 20 years. Further, it’s horrible.
Bea: Okay, that’s good to hear.
Machiventa: It’s horrible because the retardation of the political democratic processes, society, and economy are all marching together backwards over the cliff. The point is this that this is an evolutionary process. You have the team are in this kind of thinking is swept away the process of social evolution. You have a First of all, the morality of your civilization, Earth civilization is very, very primitive.
7. In the future, you will have: personal, social, societal, civilizational, and a planetary morality
In the future, you will have, yes, a personal morality, a social morality, and a societal morality, a civilizational planet morality, and a planetary morality. You’ll have five levels of morality.
8. Right now, we’re having great difficulty introducing the simple level of Societal Morality
Right now, we’re having great difficulty introducing the simple level of societal morality. See, the questions that disturb you about what I have presented to you involve societal morality.
See, we you know what is good for individuals, you know what is immoral and moral for you. You know it is moral and immoral for others. You know what is moral and immoral for groups of individuals. But for a whole society, you see, it is necessary that people begin to evolve in their thought of society. This is why we have introduced the Child Care Parenting and childrearing practices through and established social institution being the Family Learning Centers for Sustainable Nations.
In this, the child would also be taught about societal morality. That we, yes, myself and you, want to make decisions for your societies and we mean a society, like a city, a state, a nation large, large group of people, not just a community. To have every individual think of their moral responsibility to make decisions that sustain your society into the future.
That it would become a comfortable cocoon of social care and support for individuals, always from birth until they’re elder years, and for all future generations. Right now, society is seen as distant, as non-existent. Yes, it is a conceptual idea of a very large group of people.
Because, you know that even the only social group that has an address is a family are individuals. Communities don’t have an address or a GPS location? Neither do societies, neither does the civilization or the planet except for the fact that you know that where Planet is, it is the third planet of the solar system. And so, I’m striving to introduce to you the concept of societal morality.
Now, what is needed at beginning at the postgraduate level is a philosophical discussions about societal morality. And then this should be made suitable for high school level individuals and junior high grade school and even for children, small children preschool. And so, what you have been arguing about is you have been operating on the basis of a personal morality so that we can make this more easy for you.
We want it to become a palatable, discussable topic for you in your society, at home, with your friends, at work, other places. Have you ever thought about a societal morality? And then they would say, well, what’s that? And you say, well. We have a personal morality. And then we have a social morality. And everybody, even though it mostly knows about that. But What about a societal morality?
When you think of the Columbine mass shooting that occurred in Colorado 10 years ago [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre]. You realize that there was not a societal morality involved. For one, they treated the perpetrators and thought of them as individuals who were perpetrating crimes against other individuals. No, these two young men perpetrated crimes against the social institution of a school.
That is societal morality right there. Defining this and making this practicable, actionable through legislation would be huge to assist district attorneys, to the courts and so on. Our point is that, yes, you, here, and your argumentation about this topic without consulting with me about further definition caused a great, great deal of confusion.
So, during today’s presentation, we are addressing at least 3 instances where we are striving to correct the process. The social process of a group of people and of the thinking of individuals. We are preparing you for the future. We are preparing your societies for the future. This is the miserable way of having a retarded planet achieve the days of light and life. Much hard work has to be done. Much hard, disgusting moral work has to be done. And somehow it is compromising and is repugnant to you. And that shows in us that you have your morality in your heart where it belongs. Thank you so much. Please excuse me for extending this discussion.
9. From Punishment to Spiritual Continuity: Envisioning Future Justice
Bea: Thank you for that clarity. I think I feel a little bit better now. Because I do think that society, or people in general, have quite a long way to go before the collective is on board collectively on board with that kind of action, as in causing the individual to pass to the new [Morontial?] world.
I think at that point in order for that to happen everybody on this planet will have to be spiritualized to the point that they understand that causing an individual to pass to the next world is not the end of their existence. And that there will be further possibilities of rehabilitation in the next world. And I think a lot of people right now would be uncomfortable with capital punishment because they don’t know that. But in the future when more people understand the ascension journey and the part of that ascension journey that at least the earthly part of that. And that it’s that there is a continuity to life continuing afterwards. Perhaps people would be more comfortable with that type of permanent action.
I agree with you that our institutions are extremely cumbersome, and there are also individuals actively trying to make it more cumbersome for their own benefit. So, currently, we have a very difficult situation. But I do see that in the future, when society evolves, people become more aware and educated, perhaps, yes, we could definitely employ a more efficient form of justice that wouldn’t have people sitting on death row for 25 years.
Machiventa: This is Machiventa. You said a very, very pregnant phrase. When we get to that point in the advancement of society. Well, dear heart! This is the beginning of that. How do you think we’d get to that point where you would be happy and satisfied with the process? Right now, you and we in this Team are the point of contact or two points are coming together, and there’s sparks. This is the point of contact. There are sparks here. This is because we’re advancing you in the knowledge of the society that we hope you will co-create with us. There is no Shazam method to get us and you, to that point in the future where people are doing capital punishment and having people transition who are immoral? Yeah, I go for that. Now, you are at least 150 years away from that.
Bea: Okay, yes, that makes sense.
Machiventa: All of you are gonna be dead. You’ll all begun and have experienced the transition yourselves.
Bea: I agree. That makes sense.
Machiventa: So, how do we? How do I? as your planetary manager, how do I use this as a venue for the advancement of the ideas that will bring about the stage of development, social development, that you want. Now Please, put yourself in my shoes and the Melchizedek shoes. Do not continue to hide in darkness in your questions and your controversies. Come to me and ask me. This one has agreed to that. If you want to meet every day for a half hour, he will do it! Get out of the darkness, get into the light. Contact your internet spirit server.
10. Messages from the First Source Center: Beyond Religion, Politics, and Lineage
Kona: Thank you so much for that, Bea, and thank you for that Machiventa. My question is, how do we present this concept to a planet full of people who’ve been impacted by colonization, where white people have, in fact, used the idea of creating a better civilization to commit genocide. That’s one of the challenges now, is if we as predominantly white people in this room present a concept that says we want to improve society, that can be used to commit more crime. And that’s fresh in the hearts and minds of people that I talk with on a daily basis, who are people of color and marginalized.
Daniel: This is Daniel, could you break your questions statements into one question at a time, please?
Kona
Can somebody articulate that in a different way? Marthe, would you like to?
Marthe: Thank you, Machiventa. I’ll take a stab at it. You’ve suggested a wonderful plan forward to us. But seeing that those of us in this room belonged to a privileged group that have often oppressed others. How can we make sure that this is not seen as a continuation of, kind of, colonial, oppressive ideas rather than something. Thanks.
Daniel: Stop right there. You know, you got 3 questions in that one. Now, going back. You’re asking how to prevent that and there’s no way. You can affect people’s thinking. You want to influence their thinking. This is Daniel, this is simple thinking.
How many agencies exist, non-profit agencies exist and foundations exist doing exactly this thing. How do we interpret our message so that it is non-racial, non-gender, non-religious, non-political, non-moneyed?
Machiventa: Let me interject, this is Machiventa. You see, when you speak to us, you really enjoy this because, one, we are not moneyed, we’re not political. We’re not religious. We have no gender. We have no lineage of Earth or generations, and so on. We are not established as an elite corps nor an impoverished car. We present you the messages of the First Source and Center projects throughout all of the universes and all the Local Universes through their administrators, creators down through the lineage the politics of the local Creator Son’s of local universe and to here. And in this case, the voice of God has spoken to this plant through the individual Christ, Michael, known as Jesus.
Some of you believe this, some of you don’t. Some people reject the messages that Christ Michael has brought forward, some people are agnostics, some are atheists. Some are wholehearted believers not in a sect not as Protestants, not as Catholics, not as Jews, Hindus, Gentiles, or other faith but as they see us as one of them. And so, this is how it happens. How did that happen? How did people accept us? What took you to accept the messages that Christ Michael sent? Was it because he was a Jew? Was it because he was semi-white? Was it because he had the riches of the universe behind him? Was it because maybe he was just a man? Yes, I’m poking my finger in your ribs. You have the answers about you.
There are many, many people who are not prejudiced who are striving to do the same things you do. You’re asking questions that have been answered long ago. Wake up! Use your internet! I have some answers for you. They’re not easy to swallow for you, are they? Today is a tough day. If you have questions, still have questions, ask me. I am not going to answer your questions that have been answered by your mortals today, just as succinctly and just as capably as I have.
Kona: Thank you so much, Jacques, and then Bea, and let’s try to keep our questions very succinct for both Machiventa and Daniel’s sake.
11. Creating a serie of articles defining What is Human and What is Not-Human
Jacques: Thank you, Machiventa. I have heard what you said about being Non-Human, or defining What is HUMAN and What is Not Human? this is a question. And also, concerning the perpetrator, how to remove them? So, the question now for this Team is how can we promote the knowledge of defining: what is human?
Today, we have started a series of articles on: Living by the 7 Core Values, a Path to Consciousness Decision-making. My question is: Do you agree that creating a series of articles on Being Human, what it is Being Human, and give people the definition in line with the seven core values. Would this be the first step toward training people?
Machiventa: I like the phrase, he went back and I had to do with this is Daniel. It had to do with the definition of I would make writing articles about: What is Human Wonderful. You also must, at the same time within the same article, perhaps write the second half, What is what is the definition Not-Human? So, when you write the definition of what is human, you define human according to the seven values and the subsequent ethics and morality of those seven values. And the more that people adhere to that, the more human they are.
Daniel: This is Daniel, if you want a clear definition of who is Human, and who is Not Human, it is given to you in the secondary value, empathy. Now, those two young men who killed all those students and teachers at Columbine, do they have empathy? For what they were doing, how would it feel to be shot by several bullets traveling through their body? As their life force energy drained away, and their consciousness went away? No, absolutely not. Now, were they human? Oh, heavens, NO. They know any way match the definition of a human. They have done so out of their own ego, their own sense of self-entitlement, their own sense of being godlike in the most heinous of ways.
Yes, I think that would be a very good thing to do is to educate the public. One is in writing. And then, as perhaps as a two-person or three-person seminar that is video recorded. You know, they used to do it on Edward R. Murrow, and they used to do it on Omnibus Hour is Sunday afternoons on CBS 40, 50 or 60 years ago. But it still entertains people. That’s why people like the lady late evening shows by Kimmel, or whatever the fellow’s name is, who was dismissed.
Kona: Saturday night, the late nights, he’s back. Well, Bea has a follow-up question, if you’re ready?
12. Bea’s proposal for a definition of Human and Non-Human
Daniel: Go ahead, Bea
Bea: Okay, well, I have a proposal for a definition of Human and Non-Human. If you want to put it in those terms.
Daniel: This is addressed to the team, not to me, not to Machiventa.
Bea: No, this is addressed to Machiventa. I want him to comment on what I’m about to say.
Daniel: Okay. Okay.
Bea: So, my definition of a Human must not only include what it is to be a Human and what it is to be Non-Human. It must also include the, disclaimer that regardless of our behavior as Humans or Non-Humans, we are still worthy of the love and forgiveness of the First Source and Center, because that is my concern. When we make definitions such as that, I don’t want people to think that when you assign a status of a Non-Human to an individual that it is misunderstood that means they are not worthy. I would like this definition to be solely on the basis of a human’s behavior and decision-making and not self-worth, because there is a tendency in this world, for people to regard others as sub-human or non-human, and then treat them negatively accordingly.
Machiventa: This is Machiventa, you err greatly. You have mixed, simple genomics, genetic instructions with theology. The definition of being moral as a human involves simply the 7 genomic instructions of human motivation and the subsequent creation of a compatible and complemental ethic and morality.
This does not involve an individual’s relationship to God. That is up to the individual. We, as outsiders of that individual cannot force that individual to become godlike to be compassionate, become caring, to become loving. That’s up to the individual. What I, as your planetary manager, are striving to do with millions of other spiritual beings here is to create an environment that engenders the creation of other future generations of individuals, children who are innately, inherently, socialized and enculturated as moral people. And this, too, has nothing to do with God. That the God aspect has to do with individuals’ desire to be like God. We simply want to create the social environment today that supports that process. Thank you.
Bea: Thank you, Machiventa. My only point was that how we present these ideas and articles to people I believe is important, because I anticipate that some people may read an article such as that and have the same concerns that I have. In terms of people misunderstanding. Like, I do understand that the definition of a human versus non-human in the context of our conversation does not actually include the relationship with God.
But if we were to write an article about such things, I think it would be important to convey to the reader, or the audience that when we are talking about people being human or not human, being assigned those descriptors, that it does have nothing to do with their worth as a their worth or their lovability. That’s that was my point. That those two things must be separated, and be clear to the audience.
Machiventa: This is Machiventa, excellent, hooray! Then please present the topic as I have outlined and add a compassionate addendum to it concerning the believing individual. If you want to be the very best human possible, the very best moral human possible, then truly, you must follow the tenets of what Jesus said, what Jesus taught and he taught the ascension process. And that could be a short paragraph in your addendum. Thank you.
Bea: Thank you.
Kona: Thank you so much for that, and I think that this is would be in the development process, just as we are writing a series on the seven core values, before we present a series on what it means to be human, we would bring it back to Daniel and Machiventa for review, so that we have it clear and not misinterpreted from the human perspective, so that we can present that. So, we’ll have more conversation about that. Marthe, do you have a similar question?
13. Why we have no greater success with our desire to share your message that You Are Here and You Have a Plan?
Marthe: No, it’s not similar. Firstly, I wanted to thank Machiventa. I’ve really loved this conversation. I especially loved the beginning where he said, there’s no crime in the Era of Light and Life. What have we done to get there? It is such an amazingly pregnant question. I wanted to refer to something that our colleague Bob discussed with us in an email.
Bob’s question was: Why have we not had greater success with our desire to share your message that you are here, and that you have a plan, and with the seven values, I was just wondering if you can speak to that. Does it mean that we have not done the very best that each of us can do individually? Or are there other forces that are keeping us from being more successful with the message that we’re trying to share. Thank you.
Daniel: This is Daniel. Was that for Bob, or is that for Machiventa?
Marthe: That was for Machiventa.
Machiventa: This is Machiventa, let me begin by referring to the paper that this one posted on Academia EDU, and put on his own Google library: the title: We Are Here, and There is a Plan. This was published with a potential audience of over a quarter million people. Who, if they had asked, had visited this site, would have found that paper. And how many responses did this one receive concerning that paper? From either site, and this was done. A year ago? NONE! So, there must be something to be thought about the lack of response.
One is that people have forgotten how to read. People have forgotten how to be curious. People are not interested in the topic. People have seen the article and dismissed it. People are not curious about what papers are on academia EDU or Daniel Raphael’s website. Or that there is a general malaise in society generally about anything, any topic about spirituality or religion.
You see, let me give you a simple analogy of playing darts. Now, in the arc of dart throwing. You have a player, certain rules and distance. You have darts that are thrown towards a target. But in this case, a throwing darts, there’s no wall to hang it on. There’s no object in which we can throw darts to where it would stick. And so, your score is zero.
That does not mean that your intention to assist us is worthless. On contrary, pure intentions count for everything, as much as the results do. You as individuals can do the best you can, with the ideas that you have and how you present them. If you consult, if you hire a consultant to assist you, or someone who is in marketing, maybe that would help, too. But in all instances, you need an audience that is receptive. You need a dartboard that you can strive to reach both sides. Thank you.
Marthe: Thank you so much for that beautiful answer.
Kona: Thank you for that analogy, and I think that’s something that we have been working on, both Daniel and Machiventa, is creating the dartboard with our website, which we are getting responses to, and Substack, which we are getting responses to. We have social media, which we are getting responses to, so we are and YouTube, that Juan so we’re creating the dartboard, and in fact, we are getting response, which is wonderful, and we’ll continue to build on that.
That’s why we’re doing this series on how to make decisions using the seven core values. It’s an introduction to how to use the schematic. We want people to understand the Decision-Making Process and the Seven Core Values, and then begin to address their biases, expectations, assumptions, etc., using the schematic.