Spiritual Consultant/Facilitator: Machiventa Melchizedek, through Daniel Raphael, T/R

Sherille Raphael in attendance

Session Title: The Family

Design Team Members: Juan Vicente Ramirez, David Hernandez, Marthe Muller, Bea Ngai, Geoff Thomas, Jacques Reverseau

Topics

• Family Learning Centres for Sustainable Families
• Family as basic unit of society
• Children raised by institutions in the absence of families
• Worthiness to engage in this process
• An ideal family
• Surrogate births for gay families
• The attributes children need for becoming whole persons
• Knowing one’s biological mother
• Seven universal criteria for the formation of positive selfhood
• Incest as violation
• Complicity of mothers
• Perpetrators having suffered abuse themselves
• Incest as a capital crime
• Educating males about acceptable behaviour
• Possibility of rehabilitation
• Capital punishment with compassion
• A functional process to ensure the survival of society
• The American citizenry and civil anarchy
• The difference between freedom and liberty
• Programming of future generations to live as civil individuals
• Teaching the seven dimensions of human development
• Establishing Family Learning Centers and best practice examples
• Learning to develop trust and bonding skills
• Religions, governments and corporations have tried and failed
• Reframing the concepts of  punishment and self-discipline
• Alternatives to physical punishment
• The seven dimensions of human development
• Absent fathers and DNA identifiers
• Castration or freezing of sexual areas of the brain as an alternative
• Message from Machiventa Melchizedek

Family Learning Centres for Sustainable Families

Daniel reminded the team that Family Learning Centres for Sustainable Nations is a good entry into this topic, and the reason we’re doing this work is

1. to remove the impediments of social stability, social project, progress, social maturity, and social evolution.
2. to promote all efforts, socially, and individually, that would promote social stability, maturity, and evolution.

Family as basic unit of society

As the family is the primary support, the basic unit of every society, this is where we must begin to transform the societies of the future, so that they become a whole, they operate with an internal and an internal smoothness, that one thing leads to another, that individuals have a place to live and grow, that promotes their growth and their ability to become a contributing, responsible member of society.

Children raised by institutions in the absence of families

We know all about the desperate situations where children come from no families, have no mother, no father, and that they’re raised by institutions, or at foster homes and bounced from one home to another until they finally mature, on their own. What we want to do, and what we are doing, is to make the family a productive centre, where more and more individuals grow into becoming a whole, socially capable, competent and responsible adult. That’s what we want. These videos will eventually become a holistic series of family and society becoming whole.

Worthiness to engage in this process

You have already proven your worthiness to be in that work of bringing about the Days of Light and Life, because of your spiritual orientation. You wouldn’t be here if you hadn’t willed God’s will to be done in your life, somewhere along the line of your life. Okay, this is a very important process: I will to become a living expression of God’s will in my life. Oh, that’s put a saddle on your back. That gives you direction, it gives you meaning.

An ideal family

What in your mind, does an ideal family look like? How does it perform? How does it operate? And you can start from any place in the family from outside of the family to inside the family, to what does it take to create a functional family? And we’re talking about two parents, and one or two or three children,  a nuclear family that is intact, meaning there’s no divorces and so on. We are here because we are working on the ideal family. That is what we will address. There has been enough patchwork by societies to heal the ills of families and to fix families, but there has been little  earnest work to effectively create functional families. So, consider ourselves as pioneers.

Surrogate births for gay families

Marthe: Daniel, thank you. I’d like to start by bringing a level of complexity. I have a friend who has recently, in the last few months, given birth to a surrogate, a child for which she was a surrogate, for a gay couple of considerable means. And I want us, when we think of ideal families, to consider all the different permutations of families that are being created at the moment, so I would just say a family is a place where beings who are capable of love, bring new beings into existence and love them in a responsible way. But I just wanted to start with that.

The attributes children need for becoming whole persons

Daniel: Yes, there is no bias against gay couples. For women or men, as parents, the primary factor that children need from day one, and even before day one is love, acceptance. What’s the other things I have here, Sherille, on my list? People need acceptance, appreciation, recognition, validation, worthiness, and deservingness. People need that, whether they’re gay, whether they have PTSD, or whether they’re males or females, or anyone. God sees each individual as a whole potential coming into existence. God wants us to become whole. I don’t take exception with talking about gay couples as differentiated from straight couples. I don’t think it would be in our best interest to continue to make that division. I’m glad you raised that because love is central to our existence. And it is central to us becoming whole adults.

Knowing one’s biological mother

Marthe: Thank you. I was initially aware of being very tense around the option, because a baby girl was born to two men, and it bothered me, having grown up without a biological mother, that there was a child being brought into the world that would not know its biological mother, or its surrogate mother. But she will know her, in this case. There are all these complex things about humans, about mothering and fathering.

Daniel: I, having worked in criminal corrections and welfare families, and doing home visits, well, as a probation officer, can tell you that being a biological mother is no certification for being good at it. I think that’s true that there should be no distinction. However, I think it would be a good idea to keep in mind that we all contain masculine and feminine energies within us, and the need of balancing those energies, whatever the sex of the individual. Obviously cross-gender parenting is taboo in many religions and cultural groups, but God loves us all.

Seven universal criteria for the formation of positive selfhood

Geoff: That list of desirable attributes is out of NET number 95, under the title of the seven universal criteria for the formation of positive selfhood.

David: For a family,  what I understand is that there is no distinction between those two concepts, as long as homosexual couples or heterosexual couples embrace their children with the good practices of a sustainable family? I am correct?

Incest as violation

Daniel: The moral barrier is teaching children to be actively homosexual, heterosexual, and individuals, before they are of age, whether that is for homosexuality, or heterosexuality. Crossing the barriers of teaching children about sex, as an experience, will ruin the child to become a full, healthy adult, and every child has the right to their own sexuality as they grow up. A right of individuality as adults,  is to control your environment. Incest is a violation of a child’s environment, whether it be social, emotional, physical…

These discussions about the morality of sexuality, and between children and their parents, is an issue that I’ve dealt with in prisons, where a father or mother has physically taught their children how to perform sexually, from a very early age, and so on.

It is morally and ethically in violation of all rights of humanity in all regards. And it is the quickest, most sure way of ruining a child’s adult life. Sexual violation goes to the very deepest parts of our being, and they’re never forgotten ever into adulthood. It is a living PTSD for the child. Because as they grow up, they also are becoming sexually- oriented and they are denied the right of having a satisfying well-balanced sexual life as an adult.

I know that we have raised the negatives of parenting, but it’s important that there be realised that there are inviolable moral barriers, boundaries that must not be transgressed. And that anyone who knows about it, like a mother who knows that the father is violating their daughter, she is complicit with that crime. And that violation should be prosecuted in the same terms as though she was physically involved with that child.

Complicity of mothers

Bea: I don’t necessarily disagree with your comment about the mother being prosecuted in a similar fashion, however, I’m just wondering if the mother, or parent, whichever, I guess most of the time, that would be the mother, is severely abused, physically and mentally, will one make an exception for that? Her inability to rescue her child from that atrocity?

Daniel: I don’t know, what would the group do? Thanks, I will come back to that.

Perpetrators having suffered abuse themselves

Marthe: I watched the Colour Purple with my son this week, the old version of the Colour Purple, which starts with a 14-year-old girl giving birth to the second child of what she believes is her father, and later she discovers it was her stepfather.

It is something we know all over the world. Incest is such a horrific, horrific crime against the humanity of every person who has to undergo it. How does one deal with that kind of perpetration? And that gets back to Bea’s question about how to treat the mother who is in such an abusive relationship with such an incredibly cruel human being? And then going back to how many perpetrators had been sexually abused themselves, or come from histories of other abuse? So, how does one solve that in our society, in every culture?

Incest as a capital crime

Daniel: That is a topic which bleeds into the societal morality. Incest is both a personal, social and societal violation of those levels of morality. When you take the consequences of childhood abuse of any form, and that child carries that forward into their adult life, such that they cannot have normal social relationships with others, whether that means adults or teenagers or elders or children or society as a whole, then that is a capital crime. Incest crosses all cultures, all genders, all economic groups.

Now I know, and you know, personally firsthand, individuals who have been violated tremendously in their childhood, including an individual who was beaten severely by their father, and into unconsciousness numerous times in its life.

That person has suffered so many social difficulties in living with an angst so deep within them that they have difficulty relating to other adult males. I have no mercy for fathers who do that. This is murder of the individual’s identity, their realness their individuality has been stalled, squashed, ruined, and so on. Where do you think these kids come from? Who are mass murderers? What should be done about their parents? Well, obviously, it’s too late. All the crimes that we’re talking about are too late to do anything about.  There is no such thing as retroactive birth control, though we wish there was.

We don’t have any living examples of incest perpetrators who have been removed from society permanently. In my world, they would be, and the same thing goes for aggravated assault, rape, murder, kidnapping, illegal imprisonment, as those people live with the results of that all their life. And that means the potential of that one person has been squandered. God’s gift to humanity, meaning your friend, your neighbour, is lost. Capital punishment  is society’s attempt to preserve itself and protect future generations. It is simply a way of removing a person from harming more people. One with the most repeat offenders of all crimes is sex crimes. We have seen examples of a predator removing themselves through suicide from society, but they need to completely be withdrawn from society to remove temptation.

If you look across our societies, whether it’s the Americas or the UK, or any other nation, you will find great resistance to removing people who harm society.

Educating males about acceptable behaviour

Geoff: Thank you, Daniel. Well, that kind of expanded the whole subject there a little bit. But to go back to what Marthe was talking about, and also, David, I think, I think it’s prudent to recognise that the perpetrators are, almost invariably, from the male side of the species.  I don’t think we should brush that under the carpet. And obviously, it should be necessary, from a very early age, that males in particular, get educated as to the fact that that’s simply not acceptable behaviour, and what’s generally accepted within society. Also, there’s bullying that we see going on in all societies. That is a sign, a symbol, an omen, of some monster who’s growing and growing up…

Possibility of rehabilitation

Bea:  This is a little bit off the topic of the family. I just wanted to ask about capital punishment. Would there be, with incest, people who you feel cannot be rehabilitated? How would you determine that, that the person is not able to be rehabilitated? Would society even consider rehabilitation as a possibility? Or would you simply remove them?

Daniel: There is a couple of things. One is that the rehabilitation aspect of sexual predators has been tried over and over and over for over a century, and it’s proven that it does not work. Now, what we look for is merciful justice. Okay. That is our creative side of justice. That is where we do this out of a higher reason. In other words, we don’t go into prisons now, and find men who have been convicted of incest and rape and sexual assault and remove them from society. No, they will eventually be released and eventually they will commit the crime again, and eventually we will remove them at that point. Democracy is a fair society, it gives everybody a fair share.

In our society of America, the individual and the culture of individualism, is paramount, and there’s very little thought of the larger group, of caring, of having empathy, and compassion. In our society, we have taken individual isolation to the ultimate last resort, that the individual’s opinion is paramount.

Capital punishment with compassion

Geoff: I think it’s important, when that is carried out, it be done with compassion, and with empathy for that individual, so there’s no pain involved. We had a situation last night, I believe, or yesterday, where somebody in Alabama was put to death by an experimental process where they were given nitrogen gas. I think this sort of stuff is ridiculous when you have an excess of heroin in the country. A nice overdose of heroin would be reasonable, I would think.

A functional process to ensure the survival of society

Daniel:  The first one, when we deal with the justice system, and removal of the life force from individuals, is that the law must change. The law must change to reflect that the person did it. If there were witnesses to the fact that this person did it, their guilt should become implicit or explicit or immediate. There’s a Latin word for that, meaning it’s de facto. Their guilt is de facto. So, we don’t have to go through the trial of finding them guilty for violating a law. So, if the person did it, and there were witnesses, they would be arrested, taken to jail, taken before the summary court and asked if they have anything to say in their defence for what they did. And they would be shown video recordings of what they did. And that if not, the person would be taken to the place in the courthouse below where their life would be removed, by the most humane way possible.

This is not a spectator sport. This is not something to amuse people. This is a functional and practical process to maintain the legal functionality of a society and its endurance, and its survival.

The American citizenry and civil anarchy

We are now at a point  where the American people are willing to elect a felon, someone who has violated the tenets, the very basics of the democratic principles. Now, what does that say about the citizenry of that population? It is that a major portion percentage of this population of America is also at the lowest moral level of existence. Now, when a population that condones such behaviour, you realise that you’re not too far away from civil anarchy.

And so, when this collapse comes, whatever its beginnings,  will be, it will create a cascade of cataclysms, social cataclysms. And it will become extremely violent. Because those people who violate that will say, well, we have the right to do this. We are free citizens.

The difference between freedom and liberty

And if you go back to some of the original documents of Thomas Paine and others, they talked about the difference between freedom and liberty. Freedom, unrestrained freedom, leads to anarchy. Restrained freedom is called liberty.

So, when we deal with the family, children, people, we’re dealing with all of this. This is all on our plate. We are dealing with capital punishment, removal from society, we are talking about ending mass murders. We’re talking about the rehabilitation of mothers who have children who have been violated incestuously.

And to answer your question, yes, children still need a mother. And we have seen situations where children who have been violated by their father want to return to their mother, who was complicit with the knowledge that that child was being violated incestuously. Well, if that’s the case, then the mother and the child need to be in intense deprogramming and reprogramming.

Programming of future generations to live as civil individuals

See, that’s what the family that we are projecting will do. We are talking about the programming of future generations to live as civil individuals.

It is not an issue of political centeredness or being accepted. This is a matter of being able to survive in a society that is humane and wants and supports and provides for the best development of the potential of each individual. There is no going back to change what has been. You just have to say well, that was then, this is now, and we will deal with those people as they age, as they mature, as they re-enter society. And if they violate our laws, they will then be removed promptly.

See, there’s no final boundary for these crimes. You know, the death penalty as it is exercised in America is completely unethical and immoral and is totally unfair. It is, in fact a tremendous violation of the democratic principles of democracy and it just turns my stomach.

Teaching the seven dimensions of human development

Jacques: Yeah, I understand what you’re saying. And it’s a big subject of removing those people that has been discussed. Longley in the past. I think it’s better now. So, I think if we want to avoid all this, we have to come back to the foundation of this family, I mean, as was said, in the New Era Transition 52 it’s called “Exploring the seven spheres of human potential within the family.” And if we start in our training centres, to train our children on the spheres of physical, mental, emotional, intellectual, social, cultural and spiritual, then we will win. But Machiventa said one time, if you are missing, let’s say, four of the seven of these spheres, you still will have trouble and people will be much decapacitated in their ability to develop themselves. So, if we want, because I see what you’re saying, today, it’s very complex, I see everywhere when you speak about sexual assault, but what about the financial ones, though, today, many things and those who are pushing the law today we have real riots in France, because our culture is in trouble. Because there are many laws, which have been taken in Europe, that are against our sovereignty here in France. Though this is also coming back to the family, if we explore these seven spheres, in our education, we will succeed and this for me is the  ideal family, started by love.

Establishing Family Learning Centers and best practice examples

Daniel: Let me leap ahead. Let’s say I came into a lot of money. And I funded several, initially two or three, family learning centres. Well, the first project that the centre facilitator would take on,  would be going into the community with a professional, cultural anthropologist, to interview all the best examples of parents, fathers, mothers, grandparents, businesspeople, farmers, everybody. And we will be asking them, “what were the most influential experiences you had that created the person you are now?” Some will say, “Well, I was I was a rebel, until I joined the military. And I learned how to be a team member in the military.” Or they might say,” Well, my father was in prison all his life, and it was my uncle, my mother’s brother, who helped me become who I am, and set an example for me.” And so, we will be looking for those examples of civility, meaning people who are moral, ethical, and reasonable, and fair and so on, we can use as examples. And we will gather the information from them about what their parents did, or the most influential individual did to teach them how to become a whole person. Now, it is important that this not be an intellectual exercise. Because we will be going through, eventually taking all those notes and developing them into training manuals,  actual hands-on experiences, where the individual learns what it takes what to do as a good parent, and actually doing these things.

Learning to develop trust and bonding skills

Some of you, and Sherille is an example, have worked for a corporation, where they wanted to develop trust and bonding in their work teams, and where they took them on a weekend retreat to learn trust. Now how do you learn trust at the visceral level of your existence? You learn it by experience. So, they learned it by standing on a stage, many feet high, with their back towards the group in the audience area. And they were taught, they were told that the team will catch you. Do you trust these people? Yes. Well, then we asked you to fall backwards, and they will catch you. Do you know how that terrorises some people?

How do you teach trust to a child? You see, what we want to produce is self-identity. I and self-worth? How do we learn those things? What is my self-image? What is my purpose in life?  What is the meaning of my existence? These are practical exercises that we will go through in these learning centres for families. The best way we can begin is not working with the most desperate families, but the families that are in progress, of growing and evolving and maturing. We begin with people as parents who want to be good parents. And anger issues tear families apart. Sometimes this means that the individual parent has to go through anger management control, it may mean that this individual has to go through reprogramming before they can be a whole effective parent. We are looking for individuals who have an interest in being a good parent and teaching their children how to be a potential good parent in the future.

If we thoroughly accept that most children will eventually grow up and become parents, then we need to instil in them the best characteristics, the best behaviours, the best performance that they can provide to their children. In other words, children will learn how to become parents of their own eventual parents and children. So, they will also attend these classes, adult family learning centres, they will be learning as their parents learned. This is the best thinking that I’ve done around this topic, but we need to first begin with having family learning centres.

Religions, governments and corporations have tried and failed

We have religions who have done this before and failed. We have governments who  have tried this and failed. We’ve had corporations that have tried this before and failed. And so, it must come from the spiritual community. It must come from the new era individuals who are living now who want their children and grandchildren to live in a whole society.

Reframing the concepts of  punishment and self-discipline

David: Yes, I have a question. I read the book you wrote very carefully, and a question arose that has to do with how self-discipline, instead of punishment, may be taught, because in the Urantia Book it mentions that Jesus on a few, or no occasions, needed punishment to educate his brothers. So, I ask the question because I was severely beaten as a child by my parents. It was the way they tried to discipline me. How can we reframe the concept of self-discipline without punishment, or what is that punishment that Jesus was referring to?

Daniel: This has been a very deep and ongoing concern of children who are now in their 40s and 50s. They were raised with parents who were angry, who beat their children and so on. And there has been specific programmes developed to assist parents avoid physical punishment. There are many, many processes that can be applied. My two sons and my daughter use those processes rather than physical punishment. They use other means to instil self-discipline in the child. And that’s really where we want to go, is self-discipline as alternative for physical punishment.

Alternatives to physical punishment

There are definitely excellent programmes now dealing with physical punishment, and the alternatives to that. So that is why we will hire a cultural anthropologist to assist the centre facilitator You can call them a manager I would say but they really don’t manage; they really facilitate outcomes. And so that’s what we would do, first thing. This would require another organisation to then take those materials and develop them into training materials. There are just literally physical tonnes of educational materials that can be researched and used, in part to support what we want to do.

The seven dimensions of human development

David: Just to come back to Jacques’ comment about the 7 dimensions of human development. A public policy would then be, that all private/public educational centres and the same centres of sustainable families of course, teach the dissemination of the 7 dimensions of human development. That would be a public policy that we could extract from this part of the conversation, so as to stay with something specific.

Daniel: Does everybody know about muscle memory? Our body stores our memories. Okay. This where we want to imprint the deepest levels of compassion, of mental, emotional, social and cultural identifiers. When you say, “Be compassionate,’ then hopefully, the person has actually experienced an act of compassion that someone gave them, because that will be recorded in their body. And you’d say, “What does compassion feel like?” Then, when you’re addressing those levels of memory, you’re also addressing those levels of the person’s identity.

So, we would want to have exercises, actual exercises that teach those seven realms of our being, the physical, mental, emotional and intellectual, social, cultural and spiritual. And we want to teach parents altruism and forbearance.

Absent fathers and DNA identifiers

Marthe: I wanted to just mention one thing, which has a very practical effect. We were talking about families and ideal families and love. But there are so many fathers who have not recognised the children that they brought into being, which has caused enormous physical poverty of women, because there’s nothing that impoverishes women as much as single motherhood. Would one suggest that DNA tests be done to make sure that men who have brought children into being would,  for the dependent life of the child, the first 18 years, be responsible to pay, so that that child has some basic chance of having access to all those dimensions of human growth, because all of them would need money.

Daniel: You’re pretty sneaky, Marthe. That was a sneaky question, because unbeknownst to you and saying those words, we now tag people with their DNA identifiers, and that we have crossed parental DNA identifiers, that you have a DNA identifier, I have one. And when we conduct DNA identifiers with adults, children, then you have the beginnings of what you are seeking an answer to. There are laws already that are in place for this, but to enforce that is almost impossible for the lower 20% of the nation’s population. These are men who don’t work, don’t want to work, want to have sex and not take responsibility for the children that they beget. And so, you could make an argument for removing them from society, if they don’t do that. Because they are leaving an imprint of the absent father on the child for the rest of that child’s life. That would be pushing the removal argument quite a bit, but there needs to be some work around this. I’ve known men in prison who had anywhere from five or six to 15 or 17 children that they had fathered, but had nothing to do with.

Castration or freezing of sexual areas of the brain as an alternative

Bea: I’m not an expert on this topic, but what about, and this is going to sound draconian, but rather than removing people from society that have a hard time, can you not control their sexual behaviour? Could you not consider castration?

Daniel: That has proved ineffective. Okay. Okay. When you see we’re talking about sexual predators, is that they would then express their driven sexuality in other ways. Okay, they would get into severe sexual abuse, penetration with foreign objects. It just goes on and on. It’s just ugly, Bea.

I have never heard any prisoner ever say, “Well, if you do this, you keep doing that. They’re gonna take you out, which in in street talk, it means you’re going to be healed or removed from society.” Never heard that. Only in the most severe, arbitrary situations does the death penalty get exercised.

Okay, so the other option, lacking removal, would be the burning or freezing of those sexual areas of the brain that deal with sexual aggression and so on.

Bea: Or even like sexual pleasure, like I know, sexual abuse and violence is very complicated, except for the sexual predator. So, you just for my education, I guess,  my impression of sexual predators is that it’s not all sex, is that correct?

Daniel: That’s correct. And a lot of the crime has to do with just power and domination. Does that right? Okay, and has to do, let’s, let’s bring the family and has to do with the domination by an erratic mother, an abusive mother, for instance, or father. And so on. The one you would begin by rebuilding, removing, it could be by freezing, you know, cryo brow freezing, the pleasure, sex. Pleasure, so sections of the brain relating to sexual pleasure, as you suggested, then if that is not sufficient, then I think there’s sections of the amygdala that could be frozen, that would remove the aggression factor.

Bea: Yeah, I don’t think science is there yet.

Marthe: There’s nothing that would frighten me more than us trying to meddle with the human brain. I have a book here, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, by a neuro scientist/surgeon.  Please let us as humans not try and engage with the brains of others. What I do want to ask about, is the issue of soul growth of perpetrators. You said, “to remove people,” but we are not removing them out of society, or out of the universe, we are removing them to the morontia levels, where somebody else has to deal with them. So, I want to understand that, and again, it comes down to whether people can be rehabilitated. But what is the spiritual teachers and our celestial partners thinking of us, just moving all those we can’t deal with, to the next level for them to deal with?

Daniel: Yes, you want to know that. They put them in detention immediately. They put them in detention, and there are some means of reprogramming. But it can’t be coercive. It has to be voluntary. The mature individual realises eventually that they are unreasonable, unattainable. There is such a word. They can’t be fixed, they can’t be treated, they can’t be corrected. We have seen that in the adjudication. So Christ Michael initiated and the most highest initiated for the miscreants have on this planet and elsewhere is that they get to the point going don’t want you to help me. I don’t want to be treated. I just want to exit and so they are removed as if they never were. It’s actually a very good question, Marthe. We must take responsibility for our world. We must take responsibility for the condition of our children and our grandchildren and so on. Our goal is to leave this world in a better place for our grandchildren and children than exists now. We must take responsibility to remove those miscreants from this world and move them along. It’s a generous act on our part to remove them. The other option is a frontal lobotomy.

Bea: And I don’t know. That’s actually quite cruel. I would not suggest frontal lobotomy. You might as well, if you’re going to perform that, you might as well, it would be kinder to, just, you know, to move them on, so to speak.

Message from Machiventa Melchizedek

[Daniel Raphael] 18:53:59

Well, my friends, this is Machiventa Melchizedek. Let me strive to speak through this one, whose energies carry this conversation and my monologue to you. I sense the emotional withering among all of you. And that this is a topic that you will not resolve today, or tomorrow, or even in the months to come.

Now you see, truly, what I’m up against, as your planetary manager. As the selected Planetary Manager, by Christ Michael and his organization, to have me as the planetary manager here. Your questions and your problems are the same as mine. They are only different in magnitude. You are concerned about your children, and your families. I’m concerned about all the people on this planet,  and their children and their families. I am concerned about the future of all of you. I am concerned that the implementation of your good ideas now begin very, very soon. All the things that you want to see in your life and in the future of your planet, and for your children particularly, whatever age they are, is a paramount concern of ours now.

As we are sitting and observing your world, looking at the tumult around you, we are in rapid motion and earnest motion to prevent the expansion of those planetary engulfing cataclysms which are now beginning to erupt.

Obviously, we cannot change people’s decisions, and we have no need or want to do so. Now we are doing the utmost to persuade individuals in those decision-making roles, to do the utmost they can, to remain peaceful, and to be productive for the future, until we’re able to establish our first efforts of recognition among the world population that we are here. And we have a plan. And that is what you’re talking about here, it is looking for a plan. You don’t have a plan. Your societies don’t have a plan. And your civilization does not have a plan and never has had. We are beginning from scratch.

You, this Friday’s team and other teams that we work with, are our boots on the ground. You are the very beginning. You know that we are here. And that we do have a plan. And that we’re striving to unfold it, now, creatively, with you. Which makes our chore even more difficult. Thus, we do not blame you for your deflections. Or for your size or for your emotional concerns. Which are buried into your bodies from your own personal experiences. No, not at all. We do not have that memory. But we do have Christ Michael’s plan for this planet. And what that needs to do and what it needs to look like. And what it needs to affect or bring into existence.

As for this team and its future. Let us set this aside, this family business aside. Or that is something that will eventually take care of itself. Through the right and correct efforts of persuasion, of socialization and inculturation. Those are the utmost programs of the learning centres. These are now being put into place, through your thinking. Are you willing in your participation and your commitment to help us do this? You have been asking, and I mean you in the larger sense of the whole, of spiritual people,  people involved in your Correcting Time. I’ve asked for something to do. And you are doing it here in this team. And we will be doing it soon with you. Through your local community learning centres and other efforts that are visible and in front of you and actually have front doors that you can walk through. We thank you for your time you spend here, for your eagerness to engage these topics. We apologize to leave you in angst, or that is not our purpose. We learn a great deal from you. And we are striving to teach you the things that we know, that are true for individuals on a material planet. We wish you well. Through this week and always, ever more. Thank you for your commitment to yourself, your soul, your Thought Adjuster and your guardian, for assisting you to be here today.

Our thanks in thanksgiving is large, and abundant for your commitment. Good day. Thank you.